Tuesday, 6 June 2017

Save Sind (original writing of late Aslam Azhar)



This paper was probably written in the 1980s by late Aslam Azhar himself, and seems to be the text of a talk he gave somewhere, or a discussion paper.
Urdu language has been used throughout the paper in Roman English which is typed by Nasreen Azhar (orignally was written in Urdu by Aslam Azhar )

We are thankful to his wife, Nasreen Azhar for sharing his this writing with us 




This would be a beautiful world if all the people in it recognized all of those features which unite them as equal members of one human race while at the same time accepting the necessity of cultural diversity amongst themselves. Is this a utopian ideal? Two hundred years ago, given the evolution of social development at that time, one would have said, yes. Today we have a far more scientific understanding of the laws of social development, and therefore clearer insight into mankind’s collective self interest. Unity in diversity is no longer a hopelessly utopian ideal. But of course, serious difficulties remain to be overcome.

Aur hamari rah-e-talab say dard kay fasley mukhtasar zaroor hooain hain, mukammal taur par naheen hooey.

Pakistan is a multi-national state, and today after some 40 years of its existence we are still grappling with the problem of the harmonious and mutually beneficial development of its nationalities. We are still struggling for the rights of these nationalities. Still grappling with these problems? Let me rather say that with the passing of the years, these problems are becoming ever more acute, ever more seemingly intractable.   

This should surprise no one. The real and apparent contradictions between the nationalities of Pakistan are a necessary manifestation of the contradictions which prevail within a class society. And if our national contradictions today appear to some people particularly acute and intractable, this again is a manifestation of the fact that our class contradictions have been aggravated and brought more sharply into focus by the deep penetration of our society by neo-colonialism.

The contradictions between our nationalities can be resolved only to the extent that the class contradictions within Pakistani society and their neo-colonial underpinning, are first understood and, over a period of time, resolved. This is a struggle that must be waged, first at the level of understanding and ideas, and then at the level of practice. But when we speak of ‘understanding’ and ‘ideas,’ we are speaking of people – not people in the abstract, but real people in a given concrete, historical situation. We are speaking of their heritage and their present aspirations, we are speaking of their relations of production, of the productive forces which exist in them, and of their level of social development. We are speaking of their preparedness for struggle. We are speaking of their culture.

Today we are gathered specifically to consider the problems and aspirations of the people of Sind, and we are here to raise a call and a demand: “Save Sind, save its students.” I say that all sane-minded people must join in raising this demand because this is a valid demand, a reasonable demand. It draws attention to some real threats which must be examined so that they may be removed. But then, here I pause (eik zara sabar), because an important question suggests itself: Demands demand a target. At whom are we directing the demand? At the government and the rulers? At the people of the other provinces? At the people of Sind themselves? Obviously the answer is a complex answer, but equally obviously it will depend on our analysis of certain important problems of ‘being’ and of culture.

At this point in time the problems of Sind, like any people, are linked, first, to their immediate past history. Their present culture has been shaped by strongly feudal relations of production, and over the centuries they have learnt to bear their pain and oppression. Aam taur par qooat-e-bardasht eik achhee qooat samjhee jata hai. Objectively today this is a weakness, not strength, because it dulls the ability to think and act positively, and produces a sense of helplessness and of fatalism. You will recall Galileo’s impatience with the peasants of 17th Century Italy’s muqaddas ghussa.

However, during the more recent centuries, the people of Sind have also begun to struggle against oppression and bigotry, and we find inspiring examples of this in the jid-o-jihad of Shah Inayat and the fikr of Shah Abdul Latif. Objectively today, herein lie the seeds of great deeds to come.         

And then again, in recent centuries, parts of Sind saw the appearance of a significant middle class of mercantilists, whose horizons far surpassed the narrow insular feudal boundaries of Sind’s vast landed estates, jo apni saqafat mein eik had tak cosmopolitan thhey’ pardesi thhey’ yaaney mulk-o-saqafat say qadrey azad. The mercantilists of Shikarpur traded as far as Tashkent and beyond, and those of Karachi, Hyderabad and Thatta had iqtisadi aur saqafati rishtey with the whole subcontinent.

A significant section of the middle class left Sind behind in 1947. But their existence in Sind had not been that of an island, it was an organic part of the whole, and this cosmopolitan urban culture has penetrated and influenced the culture of the cities of Sind. Examples of this important feature of the life of Sind are found in the many outstanding personalities that Sind has contributed in just the last four decades, to the intellectual life of the province and the country, and to the professions. Objectively today, herein also lie the seeds of accelerated social development in the future.

Every society has its weaknesses and its strengths. It is the responsibility of the intellectual leadership of a particular society to lay bare its particular weaknesses, so that these may be overcome, and to identify the particular nature of its strengths, so that these may become the firm foundations for the builders of the future. We live today in a world in transition. Ehem aur bunyadi saval kiyey jaa rahey hain. Har simt takhmir ki keyfiat payee jati hai. Saval karney ki jurat tabdeeli kay daur ki khasiat hoti hai. Therefore our time is most propitious for a bold and ruthlessly honest examination of ourselves, for courageous answers to the critical questions of our time. Eik adh saval javab meray zehan main bhi obhartey hain jinhein main aapkey samney pesh karney ki jasarat karoon ga.

It is true that jagirdari ehed ki baqiat are still very much a part of the ethos of Sind. One clear manifestation of this is the memory of people’s attachment to their past history and traditions. Urban bourgeois societies have the capability to assess their past critically and rationally. Anything in it that obstructs the development of bourgeois interests is rejected;  s anything in it that can be used is retained. Out of this grows the bourgeois form of nationalism, within which new productive forces are enabled to grow, and this bourgeois nationalism becomes a dynamic phenomenon, a necessary though often pernicious stage in the evolution of a society. A neem jagirdari people are attached to their land, their past, their traditions less critically and more emotionally, and this is an environment in which productive forces remain congealed. The nationalism which is the product is sakit, ghair mutaharrik. Nevertheless, aaj Sind kay maashiray main bhi har taraf takhmir ki alamaten payi jati hain. Human relations have been penetrated by commodity and money relations. More and more haris are being turned into agricultural labour. More and more Sindhis are turning to the cities for livelihood. The cost of these developments in terms of human suffering is high. But we must also not fail to recognize that, in the process, feudal relations are being decisively broken down, and a new, more vigorous, more critical and rational culture is in the making. Chunachey hum dekh rahey hain keh muqaddas sabr ki jaghan muqaddas ghussa janam ley raha hai. We saw intimations of this in 1983.

These socio-economic developments, and the objectively positive heritage bequeathed by Sind’s great past, which we have briefly touched upon, prompt me to assert that the prospects are excellent for the people of Sind themselves to become the decisive force in saving Sind. But not automatically. Much conscious effort must be invested.

When we turn from Sind’s links to its past, to its relationships in the present, with its neighbours in the other provinces, and with those people who have made Sind their home after independence, we see a curious crisis of confidence amongst sections of the Sindhi middle class, and a defensive mentality. A well educated Sindhi friend of mine is profoundly convinced that the people of Sind, Sind kay asli bashindey, are being turned into Red Indians in their own homeland! Kya yeh sahi hai? Kya yeh mumkin hai? Mein yaqeen kay sath kahoon gay keh nahin! Lekin haan, hamein yeh jan leyna chahiyey hai keh kuch log hain jo iss Red Indian zehniat ka shikar hogaye hain, aur zaroori hai keh Sind kay mufakkir aur Sind kay haleef mufakkir is tarz-e-fikr ki nishan dehi karein, aur is ka ilaaj tajveez karein. Yeh Red Indian zehniat khud eitmadi ki kami ki alamat hai. Khud eitmadi na ho to rafta rafta us ki jagha beybasi lay layti hai. Logon ki qooat-e-irada, unka azm kamzor ho ja ta hai, aur is zehni kefiat kay mutavassid tabqey kay peshavar log, is kay danishvar aur tuleba apna ehem aur zaroori samaji kirdar ada karney say qasir ho jatey hain.

Adam eitemadi kay is masley ka eik aur bhi pehloo hai.

In reaction and protest against their crisis of confidence, a people can, depending on the direction and level of political awareness of their struggle, succeed in acquiring collective self confidence and an awareness of their real self interest – or they can retreat into the isolation of a narrow, sullen and defensive nationalism, from where other nationalities and people of a different cultural colour begin to appear to them as enemies and gharatgar, regardless of their clear positions. Should this happen, the greatest casualty is their “class awareness”, and this can be counted as victory only for world imperialism and the neo-colonial front.

What does he mean by this? You will note that he is formulating the condition of the Sindhis not only in economic terms but also in cultural terms. He sees the lands of the Sindhis being colonized, but he also sees – or he believes that he sees – his own culture being overwhelmed by another culture, or cultures. In his own mind, he is postulating a cultural balance of forces.

In this balance, it is not that he sees his own culture as inferior, and the other as superior. Later, he senses that his own culture lacks the necessary vigour to assert itself in the newly arisen conditions of competition. In these conditions he fears that the Sindhis are destined to meet the fate of the Red Indians in the USA.

The next great challenge that cultural work undertakes is to imbue in people rational scientific attitudes. A few short decades ago our people explained away their hunger and disease by shrugging their shoulders and stating: yeh to hamari qismat mein likhha hai. Thus did the feudal order, for many centuries, maintain its sway over millions of laboring souls. This, too, was the state in Europe in the 10th to 13th centuries. But during those centuries a middle class began to emerge, and out of it there sprung onto the stage of history the writers and poets, the painters, the song writers, the scientists, all spreading the message of reason, and Europe came out of its isolation, its beyzari, its beybasi, and its people began to proclaim: “Main hun apni qismat ka ahangar!” This was the European renaissance. In Asia and Africa too, a renaissance is in motion today, and you in Sind also have to help carry it forward with greatest speed. The objective conditions are sazgar! The poet has already proclaimed: “Dekh key ahangar ki dokan mein, tund hain sholay, surkh hai ahan.”  

Social, economic and political problems are created by contradictions inherent in the conditions of historical development. They have to be resolved by men themselves. This struggle has to be waged on two great fronts: the political and the cultural, and these two forms of struggle are inter-related and constantly influence each other. Strategies for both need to be consciously developed. It is one of our failings as enlightened people that we tend to concentrate our energies mainly on the great political issues, and consider the strengthening of our cultural life as a matter of less serious, or at least less immediate importance. It seems to me that what the people of Sind need today is a Programme of Cultural Work. What would be its main features?  

In the concrete conditions of Sind today a great function of cultural work is the creation of self-awareness. Who am I? Why am I what I am? But when we attempt answers to these questions, we find ourselves confronted by another great function of cultural work, which is to imbue in the mass of people a true sense of history. How is history made? Who are the makers of history? What are the laws of historical development? What have been the great tasks that history has set for people in the succeeding ages? What have been the great stages in the unfolding drama in the story of man?
The story of the cave man is important for me today. The story of man the hunter, man the tamer of wild animals, man the tiller of the soil, man the builder of the first great cities – Nineveh, Jericho and Moenjodaro – is important for me today. It is important that I know who they were, why they came to what they were, and why each of them passed on to the next stage of development. I am not an isolated island in the world society today, and I am not an island in the great river of history.

It is through the idrak of history, which is the product of the conscious application of reason, that people come to a correct assessment of their identity, of their identity today, and it is through this idrak that they come to understand why history has created both the ruler and the ruled, and how society came to be divided into classes – and why! More importantly, they come to understand that in the universe nothing is fixed, that motion is the essence of matter. And most importantly, they come to understand that in human society too, nothing is atal, that all things change and can be changed, and that man alone is the prime mover of change.

One thing more, people understand jahan unhein unkay mufadaat kay bohat say dushman ya hareef nazar atay hain, vahan unkay insay kaheen ziada haleef bhi hain. In the conditions of the grossly uneven development of the world in which imperialism finds ever-new ways to subvert the struggle for genuine independence of the peoples of Asia, Africa and America, har qaum aur qaumiat ko haleefon aur itehadiyon ki ashad zaroorat hai. Yeh zaroorat naguzeer hai. Because in the conditions of today it is no longer possible for any one people to struggle and win alone. Aaj Sindh ki awam kay haleef khush qismati say yaheen tarikh kay maroozi taqazon kay tehet maujood hain. Pakistan kay har soobay aur har ilaqay mein bastay hain. Tareekh ka sahee idrak isliye khas taur par zaroori hai keh yeh in haleefon ki pehchan mein ap ko madad deyta hai.

The ability to correctly identify real enemies of one’s collective self-interest and one’s objectively true allies is one of the most important benefits of a programme of cultural work.  

Aakhir mein saval reh jata hai keh billi kay galay main ghanti kaun pehnaye ga? Saqafati amal ka yeh program maasharey mein kis ki, ya kin kin ki zimaydari hai?

Let it be remembered that what I have attempted here is but a very short list of the main features of work on the cultural front. The list is endless, the themes are endless.

Saqafati sargarmian eik bhook hai jo maasharey mein har parat kay insan ko satati hai – mazdoor aur us kay khandan ko, ya kisan aur us kay beevi bachon ko, mutavasit tapqay ki har parat kay insanon ko, tulba ko. Gharz yeh kay ameer aur ghareeb – sab ko yeh bhook barabar apni lapayt mein layti hai, lekin eik tabqati maasharey ki yeh majboori hai keh ismay beshtar log bhookay hi rehnay par majboor hotay hain. Yehi vajeh hai keh jin logon ko tareekh nay taleem ki nehmaton say navaza hai ab unki avaleen zimeydari hai keh vo bazapta taur par saqafati amal kay program ko tashkeel dein aur maasharay ki vusaton and gehrayon mein jaa kar tamam logon ko saqfati sargarmion mein baqaida mashghool karein.   


~ June 2017        

Tuesday, 16 August 2016

Heart to Heart - Conversation About Aslam Azhar (Part-1)

Some people leave this world forever but they are actually not gone. Their influence on lives and thoughts of people keep them alive!
We requested few people who have been close to late Aslam Azhar's life/work or have keen observation on his work  to share their thoughts about him.


As first part of this series, we are sharing selected views here:



I got to meet Azhar uncle through his son and my friend Arieb Azhar, and for that I will forever be grateful to him. I feel privileged that my daughter and I got to interact with a man of his stature. He was a very rich man – not in terms of worldly possessions but in the matters of the intellect. I finally met someone who could make me shut up and listen in complete silence and awe. I don't know if it was his voice, his knowledge, his wisdom or his self-satisfaction that inspired awe in the people around him. People may think that Pakistan did not treat his achievements and his intellect as well as it should have, but he never had anything but love, respect and hope for this country. I would never forget when he would recite beautiful words from a book or when he would tell us glorious stories from his past. It was in such moments that I felt lucky to know him and his family. 
May he rest in peace.  

Soofia Mahmood, 
Photographer, Writer, & Communications professional 
Toronto, Canada





Aslam Azhar is one of those people who brought innovation to Pakistan Television through his work; keeping in view new demands of the TV. He was a complete institution in his own self. Hundreds of people have learned a lot from him. He was a man of principles and therefore never compromised upon them even if it was related to his work based income. It is worth noting is that he dared to work in his own progressive way by being in a state owned TV channel and that was not an easy task. Relatively silent Aslam Azhar continued doing his work assiduously. He was never made for today’s private media that runs on basis of ratings merely. He was quite professional and responsible media personality.
  



Salman Abid, 
Political analyst, Daily Express
 Lahore, Pakistan



I feel celebrating Aslam Azhar’s life and capacity he had to do so much work for positive change in the society and contributed a lot in his whole life. I will always cherish his unconditional love and support he extended to me. 
I cannot forget the time I spent working with you and learning from you. You were unique, progressive, committed, active listener, nurturing and a mentor to me. I have learned so much from you. Especially when I was working for Oxfam; you were always interested to listen to my stories working with grass root communities in Pakistan.  You gave me so much support and encouragement to do more work to reduce poverty and develop empowerment. There are so many women whose lives changed during our work filming for Voices of Pakistani Women documentaries.  I still remember an old lady’s remakes about you from Voices of Pakistani Women.  She said “Aslam Azhar is a saint who is seeking gold in the mud.”
You were truly people’s person. You have done so much to bring progress and positive change in this
society and you loved to support new and fresh ideas. Most importantly you just loved hardworking and self-made people in this country.  You were so rich inside, knowledgeable and down to earth, where no classes existed. You treated me as an equal friend.  I feel extremely privileged, honoured and lucky to have met and known you.  Your work your ideas and your dreams about people of this country will always continue and will come true one day as you used to say “Jado johad jari rahti hai”(struggle goes on)

Nuzhat Abbas
worked at Oxfam GB
Oxford, United Kingdom





~August 2016





Tuesday, 12 July 2016

For the Sake of Your Future - Listen! (original writing of late Aslam Azhar)

This is a rare piece of writing by late Aslam Azhar himself, entitled "For the Sake of Your Future - Listen!". It was hand typed by him back in 1992 in Lahore.

Credits:
We are thankful to Nasreen Azhar. She is kind enough to share this precious writing with us; who received it from Nazir Mahmood. 

The photos are taken by Abdullah Dayo



                                                                                                                                             July 2016


Tuesday, 12 January 2016

About "Defining Political Terminologies"

This was quite unfortunately our last conversation with Aslam Azhar of his life  that we never predicted even in our far thoughts. It was mid of December when we visited him and we thought to ask him to define certain political terms in his own unique style.

So we kept him asking and he was never tired of answering to us.

1- Democracy:

There are things called the will of civil society and wishes of civil society and the aspirations and dreams of civil society. All of these taken together combine to give us democracy.
Democracy is therefore an expression of dreams and aspirations of civil society.

What is wrong with democracy today?.......We realize that civil society is severely injured. 
Therefore, civil society is unable to articulate and express its dreams and aspirations. Civil Society  is injured by not any one force but a combination of forces. All of which are unsympathetic to the dreams of it and these are not just army but mullahs as well.  Our Civil Society does not suit the American power structure to thrive in the third world countries as it can overdevelop its muscles and control resources. Without this control no power is possible.

2- Anarchy:

Anarchy is quite simply a complete absence of the rule of power. In anarchy, there is no power center. In an anarchy there cannot be the rule of law and no discipline. 
Iraq is an example of democracy which is ineffective and has no rule of law. Modern Pakistan has no example of anarchy but in tribal belts of KP and in specifically in Balochistan provinces as no writ of the law existed there in past somehow.

3- Capitalism:

There is no one definition of capitalism. It is made up of number of embedded question or problems or issues. It is not just that capitalism is the rule of the rich. How is it that the rich rule . They have usurped something.   That something is the will of the people. This basically is an undemocratic society. This is around the world less in Western countries. England we know is a pre-democratic society for centuries. USA has only quite recently rare itself of slavery...how can slavery coexist with democracy...impossible!

Anarchy and capitalism together exist in Pakistan. In many villages of Sindh and Punjab anarchy rules.

4- Dictatorship:

It is the suppression of democratic rights of the people by those who hold and wheel the power. They are those who wheeled power are cohesive forces sitting on top of common people.

5- Fascism:

Fascism is quite simply the absence of rule of law.  There has to be some agency or authority that exercises authority over the society.

For example, the Thai king is himself a democrat but not autocrat. A fascist ruler does not permit anarchic ruler to survive or operate.

A liberal fascist is a contradiction within itself . There can be NO LIBERAL FASCIST!

6-Progressive:

A progressive is one who seeks change from the present for betterment.

7- Fundamentalism:

We cannot define this term unless describing fundamentalist itself.
A fundamentalist believes in and subscribes in small set of rules and principles which are fundamental to his/her ideology. A fundamentalist is one who totally and exclusively is committed to his /her own narrow vision.

8- Ideology:

It is the commitment to a narrow set of ideals that comprise an ideology. 
Marxism is not ideology to me. Marxism is set of principles committed to a progressive idea. It is wrong even to call it Marx...Ism......

9- Monarchy:

It is the exclusive rule of the ruler (an un-elected ruler). A dictator can be monarchical.
To give an example of Latin America where there are monarchs.

10- Liberal:

A liberal is a person not committed to precisely defined of rules and regulations of society. A liberal is one who thinks democratically. A liberal has to be committed to democratic society without any exception.

A neo-liberal is someone who self defines oneself as liberal.

11- Nationalism:

In one line, it is the set of rules and regulations or ideology of a group of people committed to supremacy of their nation and control over their own resources.

For instance, Baloch nationalism; which also is stuck at the federal govt. and military levels as federal govt. wants its own rule over the province.

12- Racism:

Do you really need definition of RACSIM!!....doesn't the word describe itself !

A race is committed primarily not exclusively to the interest of its own set of birth rights. One who is committed to that certain race is called racist.

13- Socialism:

In one line, it is the acknowledgement of socio-economic rights of the mass of people and be a system that guarantees the bestow of these rights on people.

14- State:

Today, the state is an entity that is contained within the acknowledged and defined boundaries of a nation. A welfare state is one in which it is sought by the rulers or those who are in opposition to rule as being set up for the benefit of the people.

15- Feminism:

Feminism is acknowledging the rights of the women of a society and after acknowledging seeking to set up a national system which guarantees those rights to the females of the population.

16- Secularism:

A secularist is one who is committed to an ideology or set of rules of belief and conduct which does not derive from any particular religion. Or set of religious beliefs but purely on relationship of humans to humans and terms of those relationship without any  reference to religious ideals.

A set of beliefs which promote secular persons vision is called secularism.


December 2015

About "Civil Society"

What is civil society and how do you see it? This was the question that we asked Aslam Azhar on one of the cold evenings in December. The usual gas shortage in Islamabad was also prevalent that day in his house. Nasreen Azhar was trying to turn on the heater and Aslam was lying on his bed and smoking. 

He pondered for a while and said that the civil society is the majority of society outside of military and government like lawyers, teachers, nurses, political groups and parties. There is quite vibrant civil society in Pakistan for instance; associations of lawyers, women, doctors, and media etc. Media in  all its forms are one of the arms of civil society.




Mentioning his last thoughts on this topic he said that one of the the good example of civil society movements has been the student’s unions (in past). They were very much part of the  vibrant civil society.


December 2015


Wednesday, 9 December 2015

About "Weak Social Contract in Pakistan"

                                                                                           
Aslam Azhar was puffing cigarette and reading "Mutant Message from Forever" by  Marlo Morgan when we entered into his room. The warm welcome was followed by  knowing his thoughts about weak citizen-state relationship in Pakistan. He started sharing his thoughts that the total confidence in government  and its services are diminishing because the social services are not delivering well. They are not delivering because government is dysfunctional.

Bad functioning of government here is evident from the fact that when its own officers need jobs they look up to private sector themselves as they don't have any substantial role of decision making in these services.. Also a government officer is not open to citizen's accountability. Our political structure is very weak. The factors behind these weaknesses include  non-commitment of civil servants and very undisciplined civil services system. It's not only commitment and bad efficiency but also  the poor policies that lead to weak governance.


There is a great danger of anarchy in near future in Pakistan he said. It has already been started in bigger cities like Karachi, Lahore, etc. Failure of the social contract leads to strong consumer society but weaker civil society.  
Countries like Czechoslovakia, Sweden and Norway are successful examples of having strong citizen-state relationship because their workers are well trained, well educated and are having good education standards. Contrary to that in a country like USA there is a lot of chaos.

Upon asking from Aslam Azhar that how can we make our governance better? After a short pause he said; only when people come to feel that the situation is now intolerable and will move to change the government. There is a great need to revise the Constitution in its true sense in Pakistan. and to reassure the people that " Mullaism " (religious clergy) can never bring any change in this society. 

Talking about if there is any force that could bring positive political change in Pakistan he said that there are some groups in bigger cities like Lahore, Peshawar and Multan but groups don't bring change because they don't command electorate and don't have larger mobilized community. So i don't see anyone on that level. India has such successful groups but we don't have any in Pakistan because as long as religion is part of state affairs we must not expect any positive change. Indonesia and Malaysia are very  liberal countries and inspite of Muslim majority population they are are going good unlike Pakistan because of them being secular in their state affairs. I understand that Pakistan is going from bad towards worse situation until society will just simply collapse, which will lead to anarchy and ultimately a change that we want. In that anarchy "Mullaism " will be washed off forever.

He further added before going for sleep that inside our military system, there is a school of thought that is against intervention of military in politics. I foresee that the next phase we will go through as  a nation will be the phase of chaos ...long before the military rules once again in Pakistan !



November 2015

Sunday, 1 November 2015

About "Consumer Society"


We are living in a consumer society Aslam Azhar said, sharing his thoughts at the start of an interesting discussion with him few days back.


“A consumer society is one in which the most important thing is to buy commodities and products beyond one’s needs. In layman language, we can say that if a society consumes beyond its basic needs like running a home and fulfilling the core material requirements necessary for life, it can be described as a consumer society.


“A consumer society is known by its own values and characteristics. Such a society thrives where there is cultural homogeneity. For instance, Pakistani society is divided into urban, rural and tribal systems and is therefore heterogeneous. Not all these systems here qualify for becoming a consumer society, although strong influences from urban areas and abroad are rapidly seeping into the whole country, giving rise to all kinds of problems.


“The other characteristic of this society is competitiveness and showing off what one has. People in developed and urban consumer set-ups are under constant pressure to prove themselves as better than their neighbours or fellows. People are never satisfied with what they have, and perhaps we can say that contentment and satisfaction are merely a kind of romanticism. It is discontentment that leads to development. Human competition too is a biological phenomenon, much like Darwin’s theory of ‘survival of the fittest’.


It is the desire for betterment and having more that brings changes to lives. Wanting to have more can be, therefore, a positive factor because if it stops so does the process of change. However, the consumer society can expand only to the extent to which the local economic development permits. In Pakistan there are many far-flung areas where there has not been any notable development because of the lack of economic incentives and life has remained more or less stagnant.

The urge to 'want to have more” has driven man from the cave to the current world. Nothing endures but change, which cannot happen if the element of greed or “want to have more” is not there. At the same time, there is no limit to the human propensity for self-destruction. There is a mutual dependence of the three elements - need, greed and self-destruction that lead to social development. At every stage, the question of “rights” arises. The basic needs common to all human beings are, in fact, their basic rights and these should be enforced.


The current modern developments that we witness today, that leave us fascinated by the wonders they unravel, is just the beginning. It is only few thousand years ago that humans came down from the trees, and they are still learning to walk. The day humans learn to walk will lead to massive change and, perhaps even destruction, which can take us back to the Stone Age!


                                                                                                                                        October, 2015