Tuesday, 6 June 2017

Save Sind (original writing of late Aslam Azhar)



This paper was probably written in the 1980s by late Aslam Azhar himself, and seems to be the text of a talk he gave somewhere, or a discussion paper.
Urdu language has been used throughout the paper in Roman English which is typed by Nasreen Azhar (orignally was written in Urdu by Aslam Azhar )

We are thankful to his wife, Nasreen Azhar for sharing his this writing with us 




This would be a beautiful world if all the people in it recognized all of those features which unite them as equal members of one human race while at the same time accepting the necessity of cultural diversity amongst themselves. Is this a utopian ideal? Two hundred years ago, given the evolution of social development at that time, one would have said, yes. Today we have a far more scientific understanding of the laws of social development, and therefore clearer insight into mankind’s collective self interest. Unity in diversity is no longer a hopelessly utopian ideal. But of course, serious difficulties remain to be overcome.

Aur hamari rah-e-talab say dard kay fasley mukhtasar zaroor hooain hain, mukammal taur par naheen hooey.

Pakistan is a multi-national state, and today after some 40 years of its existence we are still grappling with the problem of the harmonious and mutually beneficial development of its nationalities. We are still struggling for the rights of these nationalities. Still grappling with these problems? Let me rather say that with the passing of the years, these problems are becoming ever more acute, ever more seemingly intractable.   

This should surprise no one. The real and apparent contradictions between the nationalities of Pakistan are a necessary manifestation of the contradictions which prevail within a class society. And if our national contradictions today appear to some people particularly acute and intractable, this again is a manifestation of the fact that our class contradictions have been aggravated and brought more sharply into focus by the deep penetration of our society by neo-colonialism.

The contradictions between our nationalities can be resolved only to the extent that the class contradictions within Pakistani society and their neo-colonial underpinning, are first understood and, over a period of time, resolved. This is a struggle that must be waged, first at the level of understanding and ideas, and then at the level of practice. But when we speak of ‘understanding’ and ‘ideas,’ we are speaking of people – not people in the abstract, but real people in a given concrete, historical situation. We are speaking of their heritage and their present aspirations, we are speaking of their relations of production, of the productive forces which exist in them, and of their level of social development. We are speaking of their preparedness for struggle. We are speaking of their culture.

Today we are gathered specifically to consider the problems and aspirations of the people of Sind, and we are here to raise a call and a demand: “Save Sind, save its students.” I say that all sane-minded people must join in raising this demand because this is a valid demand, a reasonable demand. It draws attention to some real threats which must be examined so that they may be removed. But then, here I pause (eik zara sabar), because an important question suggests itself: Demands demand a target. At whom are we directing the demand? At the government and the rulers? At the people of the other provinces? At the people of Sind themselves? Obviously the answer is a complex answer, but equally obviously it will depend on our analysis of certain important problems of ‘being’ and of culture.

At this point in time the problems of Sind, like any people, are linked, first, to their immediate past history. Their present culture has been shaped by strongly feudal relations of production, and over the centuries they have learnt to bear their pain and oppression. Aam taur par qooat-e-bardasht eik achhee qooat samjhee jata hai. Objectively today this is a weakness, not strength, because it dulls the ability to think and act positively, and produces a sense of helplessness and of fatalism. You will recall Galileo’s impatience with the peasants of 17th Century Italy’s muqaddas ghussa.

However, during the more recent centuries, the people of Sind have also begun to struggle against oppression and bigotry, and we find inspiring examples of this in the jid-o-jihad of Shah Inayat and the fikr of Shah Abdul Latif. Objectively today, herein lie the seeds of great deeds to come.         

And then again, in recent centuries, parts of Sind saw the appearance of a significant middle class of mercantilists, whose horizons far surpassed the narrow insular feudal boundaries of Sind’s vast landed estates, jo apni saqafat mein eik had tak cosmopolitan thhey’ pardesi thhey’ yaaney mulk-o-saqafat say qadrey azad. The mercantilists of Shikarpur traded as far as Tashkent and beyond, and those of Karachi, Hyderabad and Thatta had iqtisadi aur saqafati rishtey with the whole subcontinent.

A significant section of the middle class left Sind behind in 1947. But their existence in Sind had not been that of an island, it was an organic part of the whole, and this cosmopolitan urban culture has penetrated and influenced the culture of the cities of Sind. Examples of this important feature of the life of Sind are found in the many outstanding personalities that Sind has contributed in just the last four decades, to the intellectual life of the province and the country, and to the professions. Objectively today, herein also lie the seeds of accelerated social development in the future.

Every society has its weaknesses and its strengths. It is the responsibility of the intellectual leadership of a particular society to lay bare its particular weaknesses, so that these may be overcome, and to identify the particular nature of its strengths, so that these may become the firm foundations for the builders of the future. We live today in a world in transition. Ehem aur bunyadi saval kiyey jaa rahey hain. Har simt takhmir ki keyfiat payee jati hai. Saval karney ki jurat tabdeeli kay daur ki khasiat hoti hai. Therefore our time is most propitious for a bold and ruthlessly honest examination of ourselves, for courageous answers to the critical questions of our time. Eik adh saval javab meray zehan main bhi obhartey hain jinhein main aapkey samney pesh karney ki jasarat karoon ga.

It is true that jagirdari ehed ki baqiat are still very much a part of the ethos of Sind. One clear manifestation of this is the memory of people’s attachment to their past history and traditions. Urban bourgeois societies have the capability to assess their past critically and rationally. Anything in it that obstructs the development of bourgeois interests is rejected;  s anything in it that can be used is retained. Out of this grows the bourgeois form of nationalism, within which new productive forces are enabled to grow, and this bourgeois nationalism becomes a dynamic phenomenon, a necessary though often pernicious stage in the evolution of a society. A neem jagirdari people are attached to their land, their past, their traditions less critically and more emotionally, and this is an environment in which productive forces remain congealed. The nationalism which is the product is sakit, ghair mutaharrik. Nevertheless, aaj Sind kay maashiray main bhi har taraf takhmir ki alamaten payi jati hain. Human relations have been penetrated by commodity and money relations. More and more haris are being turned into agricultural labour. More and more Sindhis are turning to the cities for livelihood. The cost of these developments in terms of human suffering is high. But we must also not fail to recognize that, in the process, feudal relations are being decisively broken down, and a new, more vigorous, more critical and rational culture is in the making. Chunachey hum dekh rahey hain keh muqaddas sabr ki jaghan muqaddas ghussa janam ley raha hai. We saw intimations of this in 1983.

These socio-economic developments, and the objectively positive heritage bequeathed by Sind’s great past, which we have briefly touched upon, prompt me to assert that the prospects are excellent for the people of Sind themselves to become the decisive force in saving Sind. But not automatically. Much conscious effort must be invested.

When we turn from Sind’s links to its past, to its relationships in the present, with its neighbours in the other provinces, and with those people who have made Sind their home after independence, we see a curious crisis of confidence amongst sections of the Sindhi middle class, and a defensive mentality. A well educated Sindhi friend of mine is profoundly convinced that the people of Sind, Sind kay asli bashindey, are being turned into Red Indians in their own homeland! Kya yeh sahi hai? Kya yeh mumkin hai? Mein yaqeen kay sath kahoon gay keh nahin! Lekin haan, hamein yeh jan leyna chahiyey hai keh kuch log hain jo iss Red Indian zehniat ka shikar hogaye hain, aur zaroori hai keh Sind kay mufakkir aur Sind kay haleef mufakkir is tarz-e-fikr ki nishan dehi karein, aur is ka ilaaj tajveez karein. Yeh Red Indian zehniat khud eitmadi ki kami ki alamat hai. Khud eitmadi na ho to rafta rafta us ki jagha beybasi lay layti hai. Logon ki qooat-e-irada, unka azm kamzor ho ja ta hai, aur is zehni kefiat kay mutavassid tabqey kay peshavar log, is kay danishvar aur tuleba apna ehem aur zaroori samaji kirdar ada karney say qasir ho jatey hain.

Adam eitemadi kay is masley ka eik aur bhi pehloo hai.

In reaction and protest against their crisis of confidence, a people can, depending on the direction and level of political awareness of their struggle, succeed in acquiring collective self confidence and an awareness of their real self interest – or they can retreat into the isolation of a narrow, sullen and defensive nationalism, from where other nationalities and people of a different cultural colour begin to appear to them as enemies and gharatgar, regardless of their clear positions. Should this happen, the greatest casualty is their “class awareness”, and this can be counted as victory only for world imperialism and the neo-colonial front.

What does he mean by this? You will note that he is formulating the condition of the Sindhis not only in economic terms but also in cultural terms. He sees the lands of the Sindhis being colonized, but he also sees – or he believes that he sees – his own culture being overwhelmed by another culture, or cultures. In his own mind, he is postulating a cultural balance of forces.

In this balance, it is not that he sees his own culture as inferior, and the other as superior. Later, he senses that his own culture lacks the necessary vigour to assert itself in the newly arisen conditions of competition. In these conditions he fears that the Sindhis are destined to meet the fate of the Red Indians in the USA.

The next great challenge that cultural work undertakes is to imbue in people rational scientific attitudes. A few short decades ago our people explained away their hunger and disease by shrugging their shoulders and stating: yeh to hamari qismat mein likhha hai. Thus did the feudal order, for many centuries, maintain its sway over millions of laboring souls. This, too, was the state in Europe in the 10th to 13th centuries. But during those centuries a middle class began to emerge, and out of it there sprung onto the stage of history the writers and poets, the painters, the song writers, the scientists, all spreading the message of reason, and Europe came out of its isolation, its beyzari, its beybasi, and its people began to proclaim: “Main hun apni qismat ka ahangar!” This was the European renaissance. In Asia and Africa too, a renaissance is in motion today, and you in Sind also have to help carry it forward with greatest speed. The objective conditions are sazgar! The poet has already proclaimed: “Dekh key ahangar ki dokan mein, tund hain sholay, surkh hai ahan.”  

Social, economic and political problems are created by contradictions inherent in the conditions of historical development. They have to be resolved by men themselves. This struggle has to be waged on two great fronts: the political and the cultural, and these two forms of struggle are inter-related and constantly influence each other. Strategies for both need to be consciously developed. It is one of our failings as enlightened people that we tend to concentrate our energies mainly on the great political issues, and consider the strengthening of our cultural life as a matter of less serious, or at least less immediate importance. It seems to me that what the people of Sind need today is a Programme of Cultural Work. What would be its main features?  

In the concrete conditions of Sind today a great function of cultural work is the creation of self-awareness. Who am I? Why am I what I am? But when we attempt answers to these questions, we find ourselves confronted by another great function of cultural work, which is to imbue in the mass of people a true sense of history. How is history made? Who are the makers of history? What are the laws of historical development? What have been the great tasks that history has set for people in the succeeding ages? What have been the great stages in the unfolding drama in the story of man?
The story of the cave man is important for me today. The story of man the hunter, man the tamer of wild animals, man the tiller of the soil, man the builder of the first great cities – Nineveh, Jericho and Moenjodaro – is important for me today. It is important that I know who they were, why they came to what they were, and why each of them passed on to the next stage of development. I am not an isolated island in the world society today, and I am not an island in the great river of history.

It is through the idrak of history, which is the product of the conscious application of reason, that people come to a correct assessment of their identity, of their identity today, and it is through this idrak that they come to understand why history has created both the ruler and the ruled, and how society came to be divided into classes – and why! More importantly, they come to understand that in the universe nothing is fixed, that motion is the essence of matter. And most importantly, they come to understand that in human society too, nothing is atal, that all things change and can be changed, and that man alone is the prime mover of change.

One thing more, people understand jahan unhein unkay mufadaat kay bohat say dushman ya hareef nazar atay hain, vahan unkay insay kaheen ziada haleef bhi hain. In the conditions of the grossly uneven development of the world in which imperialism finds ever-new ways to subvert the struggle for genuine independence of the peoples of Asia, Africa and America, har qaum aur qaumiat ko haleefon aur itehadiyon ki ashad zaroorat hai. Yeh zaroorat naguzeer hai. Because in the conditions of today it is no longer possible for any one people to struggle and win alone. Aaj Sindh ki awam kay haleef khush qismati say yaheen tarikh kay maroozi taqazon kay tehet maujood hain. Pakistan kay har soobay aur har ilaqay mein bastay hain. Tareekh ka sahee idrak isliye khas taur par zaroori hai keh yeh in haleefon ki pehchan mein ap ko madad deyta hai.

The ability to correctly identify real enemies of one’s collective self-interest and one’s objectively true allies is one of the most important benefits of a programme of cultural work.  

Aakhir mein saval reh jata hai keh billi kay galay main ghanti kaun pehnaye ga? Saqafati amal ka yeh program maasharey mein kis ki, ya kin kin ki zimaydari hai?

Let it be remembered that what I have attempted here is but a very short list of the main features of work on the cultural front. The list is endless, the themes are endless.

Saqafati sargarmian eik bhook hai jo maasharey mein har parat kay insan ko satati hai – mazdoor aur us kay khandan ko, ya kisan aur us kay beevi bachon ko, mutavasit tapqay ki har parat kay insanon ko, tulba ko. Gharz yeh kay ameer aur ghareeb – sab ko yeh bhook barabar apni lapayt mein layti hai, lekin eik tabqati maasharey ki yeh majboori hai keh ismay beshtar log bhookay hi rehnay par majboor hotay hain. Yehi vajeh hai keh jin logon ko tareekh nay taleem ki nehmaton say navaza hai ab unki avaleen zimeydari hai keh vo bazapta taur par saqafati amal kay program ko tashkeel dein aur maasharay ki vusaton and gehrayon mein jaa kar tamam logon ko saqfati sargarmion mein baqaida mashghool karein.   


~ June 2017